![]() The nature of the scene may also be important. Either my eyesight is worse than Laurences’s, or I don’t know what to look for (or more likely, both the above!). ![]() I have only done limited testing, but I could not see any obvious degradation at the trims. (etc.) In actual practice, in an HDV smart-render, the degradation around the edit points and to the next i-frame is clearly visable, even to a strongly spectacled individual such as myself. That is to say, the bulk of the smart-render should be identical and there should be some second generation loss around the edit points and in to the next I-frame. Did JR mean something else?Īlso, Laurence said, “Theoretically, a smart-render of HDV and XDcam done at the 1440x1080 dimensions and a 25Mbps bitrate should look the same. I always thought that Vegas smart rendered m2t files (HDV), meaning that the GOP(s) where a cut or cuts had been made would be re-rendered but the rest would be passed through unchanged. In this thread JonnyRoy said, “ I know of no tool that will trim M2T files without re-rendering so it must be hard to do or someone would have done it.”
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |